Where can I ask the following?
The Cisco Field Notice: FN - 63697 was first released on 11-Nov-13, advising customers that RJ45 boots "Might Push the Mode Button and Cause an Unexpected Reset on [some] Switches". This caused a recall of those devices, costing Cisco many monies.
Consequentially, the Internet likes to ridicule the designer of this particular device for missing this, however, is it really their fault? Is the boot actually part of the RJ45 design specification, or is it a non-standard addition?
- If the RJ45 boot is not included in the RJ45 spec, then it would be a non-standard addition. As such, the Cisco design team should be forgiven as they would have been working to the official specification.
- If, however, the RJ45 boot is included in the official RJ45 spec, then indeed, the Cisco design team should have known better.
I have tried to find a definitive answer but cannot find one. I would be most grateful for your help!
