Skip to main content
edited title
Link
nanofarad
  • 41.6k
  • 16
  • 15

How should we handle edits adding unnecessary inline `code` tagsformatting?

Binary pronouns -> inclusive 'they'
Source Link
nanofarad
  • 41.6k
  • 16
  • 15

I've seen a few (more than a few, no links at the moment) suggested edits where the user simply wants to add code tags as he/she thinksthey believe code is needed for every proper noun on Stack Overflow. The source is not otherwise improved. Should I reject? I have been using too minor so far.

I've seen a few (more than a few, no links at the moment) suggested edits where the user simply wants to add code tags as he/she thinks code is needed for every proper noun on Stack Overflow. The source is not otherwise improved. Should I reject? I have been using too minor so far.

I've seen a few (more than a few, no links at the moment) suggested edits where the user simply wants to add code tags as they believe code is needed for every proper noun on Stack Overflow. The source is not otherwise improved. Should I reject? I have been using too minor so far.

have more faith in the community!
Source Link

I've seen a few (more than a few, no links at the moment) suggested edits where the user simply wants to add code tags as he/she thinks code is needed for every proper noun on Stack Overflow. The source is not otherwise improved. Should I reject? I have been using too minor so far.

The formatting I'm using is used to prove a point, please do not edit it away.

I've seen a few (more than a few, no links at the moment) suggested edits where the user simply wants to add code tags as he/she thinks code is needed for every proper noun on Stack Overflow. The source is not otherwise improved. Should I reject? I have been using too minor so far.

The formatting I'm using is used to prove a point, please do not edit it away.

I've seen a few (more than a few, no links at the moment) suggested edits where the user simply wants to add code tags as he/she thinks code is needed for every proper noun on Stack Overflow. The source is not otherwise improved. Should I reject? I have been using too minor so far.

Source Link
nanofarad
  • 41.6k
  • 16
  • 15
Loading