Timeline for What's the policy on editing "technical" terms?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 13:00 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://opensource.stackexchange.com/ with https://opensource.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Jul 13, 2015 at 15:16 | comment | added | Zizouz212 | I've raised the main ideas on Meta SE: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/260558/… | |
| Jul 12, 2015 at 21:23 | comment | added | curiousdannii | I think this post is getting too muddled. Reviewer laziness seems very tangential to the other issues. | |
| Jul 12, 2015 at 14:56 | comment | added | Zizouz212 | I have to say a couple things: unicorns is our beloved SE example, the edit was an update, and I made that update, and I'm talking about minor edits that seemingly "correct" information by changing the terminology in a post. | |
| Jul 12, 2015 at 14:07 | comment | added | user490 | Your question is not getting any clearer to me by our edit. Are we talking about technical terms or about using the terminology a third party uses when she is refering to her work? What is all this unicorn stuff about? | |
| Jul 12, 2015 at 13:36 | history | edited | Zizouz212 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 1701 characters in body |
| Jul 12, 2015 at 6:45 | answer | added | overactor | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 12, 2015 at 5:58 | answer | added | user490 | timeline score: -1 | |
| Jul 12, 2015 at 5:02 | answer | added | curiousdannii | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jul 12, 2015 at 4:28 | history | edited | Zizouz212 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 61 characters in body |
| Jul 12, 2015 at 4:12 | history | asked | Zizouz212 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |