Timeline for Weak copyleft LGPL-like license for static linking
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2024 at 15:12 | answer | added | AvidCoder | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 11, 2024 at 16:53 | vote | accept | Gregory Khvatsky | ||
| Jul 10, 2024 at 13:11 | comment | added | Gregory Khvatsky | To me, there should be no difference, they should both be distributed using the same license, with the new file copyrighted to its new author in both cases. I should be able to take the new file and add it my library (of course, preserving the copyright). If something (another library or program or whatever) links to the library only using it's public interface, this new piece of software can be distributed using whatever license + copyright notice. | |
| Jul 10, 2024 at 12:49 | comment | added | user1937198 | Challenge here: How do you define the difference betwen adding a file to your library, vs creating a library that includes your library and one extra file? | |
| Jul 10, 2024 at 7:15 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Jul 10, 2024 at 7:14 | answer | added | Bart van Ingen Schenau | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jul 9, 2024 at 21:21 | history | edited | Gregory Khvatsky | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 80 characters in body; edited title |
| Jul 9, 2024 at 21:15 | history | edited | Gregory Khvatsky | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 2 characters in body |
| S Jul 9, 2024 at 21:14 | review | First questions | |||
| Jul 10, 2024 at 5:15 | |||||
| S Jul 9, 2024 at 21:14 | history | asked | Gregory Khvatsky | CC BY-SA 4.0 |