Timeline for Provide closed-source application with LGPL-Libraries
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2018 at 19:58 | history | edited | Mureinik | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 1 character in body |
| Oct 13, 2016 at 8:22 | vote | accept | Peter | ||
| Oct 12, 2016 at 12:52 | history | edited | Peter | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 113 characters in body |
| Oct 12, 2016 at 12:52 | answer | added | Mans Gunnarsson | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 12, 2016 at 12:49 | history | edited | Peter | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 113 characters in body |
| Oct 12, 2016 at 12:08 | comment | added | Mans Gunnarsson | Also, on a related but maybe off-topic note, if you are using an LGPL 2.1 library that contains patented technology in a commercial product the patent owners might start asking for money, so this is also something you'll want to consider. | |
| Oct 12, 2016 at 11:59 | comment | added | Mans Gunnarsson | Are the libraries LGPL 2.1 or LGPL 3.0? The requirements for both disclosure and distribution can be interpreted slightly differently between those two versions of the LGPL. | |
| Oct 12, 2016 at 11:25 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 13, 2016 at 5:41 | |||||
| Oct 12, 2016 at 11:22 | history | asked | Peter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |