Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

4
  • I don't get why you think that streaming the video of your monitor somehow affects the textual representation of the source code you produce. These are completely different things. One thing is the video file that gets uploaded to Twitch, an other is the GitHub repo that you might setup with that code... Section 8 that you quoted defines User Content as the audio/video stream and also the content of the chat (which, as text, could be code), however the code that you display through the video stream is not under User Content, only the video itself is. Commented Dec 31, 2017 at 9:30
  • @Bakuriu Because I am quite confused on all this licensing wordings. Since I am "displaying" (word in cited ToS) some "code" (also in ToS), it seemed to me that I'll "grant Twitch... an unrestricted ... right to ..." (do everything they want). If if license my code with some open source license that forbid to do some of the things Twitch want to do, I felt there might be some collision. I just want not to be sued ! Thus, I asked this question to clarify. ( Commented Dec 31, 2017 at 18:46
  • also, for instance, I overlooked the "non-exclusive" term , as amon explained in his answer, it means I'm not giving away my rights to do as I want, I was not aware of this. So it is much reassuring. Commented Dec 31, 2017 at 18:46
  • Also, there might not be only code on monitor video, but also in chat for instance. Commented Dec 31, 2017 at 18:50