Timeline for Is "license": "MIT" in config enough to be a valid license in a software project?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Oct 20, 2024 at 7:09 | history | mod moved comments to chat | |||
| S Oct 20, 2024 at 7:09 | comment | added | MadHatter♦ | Comments have been moved to chat; please do not continue the discussion here. Before posting a comment below this one, please review the purposes of comments. Comments that do not request clarification or suggest improvements usually belong as an answer, on Open Source Meta, or in Open Source Chat. Comments continuing discussion may be removed. | |
| Aug 16, 2018 at 7:23 | comment | added | Bart van Ingen Schenau | @DamienGolding: The MIT license is short enough that you should just include it. However, the Apache License Version 2.0 mentions in its "How to apply" page that you should link to the license text. | |
| Aug 16, 2018 at 5:05 | comment | added | Damien Golding | "or linked from within the project" - Correct me if I am wrong, but you mean containing an external link to the MIT text would be allowed. Is this really allowed? Are there any examples of this in popular software projects? | |
| Aug 15, 2018 at 15:59 | history | answered | Bart van Ingen Schenau | CC BY-SA 4.0 |