Skip to main content
Open Source

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • Thank you for the response. I'm sure it's normal, and I'm quite aware of what effort is involved. But is it required? Am I in violation of the license if I do not include it as a view available to the end user in the output binary of my app, but only the source tree? Commented Apr 16, 2020 at 22:29
  • @Teekin see the first para of my answer: yes, it is required. I've added a short second para to make that even more explicit. Commented Apr 17, 2020 at 5:13
  • 1
    Thank you for clearing that up. This still leaves me confused as to all the unmodified libraries that are merely included in the build, i.e. used by the app but not in the repo. Do I need to list the licenses of those as well? It seems unrealistic and in fact not very useful but it appears to me that strictly speaking it's also required. I'm using about 600 packages. Commented Apr 17, 2020 at 14:02
  • If you are distributing those libraries, then yes, you do. Commented Apr 17, 2020 at 14:38
  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. Commented Apr 26, 2020 at 10:37