Skip to main content

Questions tagged [continuation-in-part]

1 vote
0 answers
29 views

I am filing a new nonprovisional application that is a CIP that will reference two prior nonprovisional applications - in the ADS if I claim priority the "July 2020" does the 20-year time ...
InFlight's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
205 views

Scenario: My client filed a US Provisional 3 years ago and followed it up with a non-provisional 2 years ago. The patent has not been allowed (pending grant since issue fee hasn't been paid yet). ...
Sagar Alias's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
160 views

Google Patents says that US patent application US11/673,907 is now abandoned for "FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION". But before it was abandoned US29/339,218 was filed as a ...
Matt Thomas's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
52 views

I understand that a "straight" continuation allows for the addition of new claims, but no new matter in the description. I also understand that a "continuation in part" allows for ...
jordanpg's user avatar
  • 253
1 vote
1 answer
70 views

The parent application was filed in 2019 based on a provisional filed in 2018. I didn’t fast track the parent, thus it is still pending, and it contained enough material for several patents. Since ...
Lou's user avatar
  • 217
1 vote
1 answer
128 views

I'm filing 2 CIPs on a US parent application that was published less than a year ago, with the specification cross-referencing the parent and a couple of later provisionals. Should the IDSs list any ...
Lou's user avatar
  • 217
1 vote
1 answer
67 views

I have one patent application filed and two more coming soon, all on the same general subject matter. Application A was filed in 2018 and has yet to see action, and I will soon be filing applications ...
Lou's user avatar
  • 217
0 votes
1 answer
113 views

Let's just say, I filed a Provisional Application in Jan 2019. I filed a non-provisional in Dec 2019 by claiming priority to the Provisional, properly. But I missed some content in non-provisional ...
PrivateUser's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
34 views

As a practical matter, is it better to use the same docket number with electronic filings for CIPs of a parent application, or different ones?
Lou's user avatar
  • 217
1 vote
1 answer
319 views

I filed a first provisional and a non-provisional claiming priority to the first provisional less than a year later. Now I've made substantial improvements and would like to protect it before the non-...
Lou's user avatar
  • 217
0 votes
1 answer
114 views

If I understand correctly USPTO is a "relative novelty" office. There is a grace period of 1 year. Whereas EPO is an "absolute novelty" office. Anything disclosed before filing will be used against ...
PrivateUser's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
56 views

First, an explanation of the overall context is needed: A CIP has been filed by a sole inventor (me). After filing, it was decided that another individual probably should have been credited as a co-...
Charles's user avatar
  • 643
1 vote
1 answer
46 views

In a CIP application that is essentially an improvement on one's own prior art: Should specifications review and summarize what the parent patent (or application) does (maybe state that patent's ...
Charles's user avatar
  • 643
0 votes
1 answer
208 views

In a Continuation in Part application, and referring only to those claims from the original application where they, and the specifications they refer to, are remaining unchanged – is there any need to ...
Charles's user avatar
  • 643
1 vote
1 answer
273 views

A patent can be "kept alive" by filing a continuation before the patent issues, and then continuing to file continuations in the same manner in a chain of applications. Does the same hold for filing ...
Keir Finlow-Bates's user avatar

15 30 50 per page