Skip to main content

Questions tagged [scope]

0 votes
0 answers
48 views

original patent: https://patents.google.com/patent/US11386172B1/en?oq=11%2c386%2c172 https://patentcenter.uspto.gov/applications/15916086/ifw/docs?application= continued patent: https://patents.google....
Bear Bile Farming is Torture's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
31 views

I am deciding between a more general title vs a more specific title. Since the title can also limit the scope, I cannot think of a reason to use the more specific title?
Bear Bile Farming is Torture's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
33 views

a computer implemented method, comprising: receiving a request from a first user using a first electronic device; sending a response to the first electronic device; .... If every step of the claim, ...
Bear Bile Farming is Torture's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
34 views

In a software method and system, there is a data object which has two main states: "started/pending" and "completed". The specifications also mention an optional third state: "...
Bear Bile Farming is Torture's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
44 views

In my patent application, there is paragraph at the bottom that explicitly states that "examples" are for the purpose of illustrating the invention in a concrete way. Let's suppose that in ...
Bear Bile Farming is Torture's user avatar
1 vote
4 answers
354 views

Let's suppose that a patent claim consists of 3 elements, A, B, and C. It is only infringement if someone creates a product that contains at least 3 of those elements. Hence, would it not beehive the ...
Bear Bile Farming is Torture's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
241 views

It is generally stated in that one must both show ownership of and give the public the invention in order to get the monopoly rights of a claim (e.g. 112 in US, Art. 83 EPO). However, for purposes of ...
user132162's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
84 views

"Full scope" enablement -- i.e. that the entire scope of the claim is enabled under 35 USC 112 -- has been identified as a requirement in case law. See here. Also from MPEP 2164.08: The Federal ...
user132162's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
77 views

In reference to the patent: WO2017024291A3
Scott's user avatar
  • 11
2 votes
1 answer
144 views

My experience with design patents is fairly limited. I generally have a good idea what the scope of the claim is and know that dashed lines are not part of the claim. That being said, I have very ...
bstovall's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
67 views

My patent may have several types of new inventions within it. If I get a patent on my one invention do I have some type of patent rights over those other novel features in the invention or do I ...
user16568's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
123 views

Suppose the Claim 1 of a patent is as follows: An assembly comprising: ...; a threaded nut positioned at least partially within the housing such that the nut is fixed against rotation ...
John M.'s user avatar
  • 143
3 votes
2 answers
172 views

In reference to the design patent: USD 666,896 S1 Can a similar product be made without violating this patent? What exactly is patented? The loops? The look?
user15622's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
57 views

In reference to the patent: US D675,875 S1 What exactly is the patent on this product?
Aaron's user avatar
  • 3
3 votes
1 answer
1k views

In reference to the design patent: US D680,805 "Wide mouth flask". So any flask or bottles like these can't have this type of cap?
Samuel H's user avatar

15 30 50 per page