Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

4
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! I think I get it now. However I want to know your "opinion" about my last question: what does it mean physically when a propagator diverge? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 22, 2015 at 7:28
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Crazydemon: No opinion to give, it's a well-known fact (called the Källén-Lehmann spectral representation) that the poles of the propagator correspond to the $n$-particle states of the theory. In other words - the value of $p^2$ where the free propagator diverges is the mass. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 22, 2015 at 13:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Not well known for me, I'm currently doing QED as a student. Thank you very much! $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 22, 2015 at 17:33
  • $\begingroup$ @ACuriousMind is there any intuition behind why the poles of the propagator correspond to the on-mass-shell particle states of the theory? $\endgroup$ Commented May 11, 2021 at 14:14