I read in my Physics textbook that an inertial frame of reference should not spin. Thus the, Earth should not be used to calculate the position, velocity, or acceleration of satellites and rockets. Instead, it should be done using stars as the inertial frame of reference should be done. However, don't stars spin about their "y" axis$y$-axis too? Thus utilizing Earth as an inertial frame of reference should be ok.
"Strictly speaking, Newton’s laws of motion are valid only in a coordinate system at rest with respect to the 'fixed' stars. Such a system is known as a Newtonian, or inertial reference frame. The laws are also valid in any set of rigid axes moving with constant velocity and without rotation relative to the inertial frame; this concept is known as the principle of Newtonian or Galilean relativity."
"Strictly speaking, Newton’s laws of motion are valid only in a coordinate system at rest with respect to the “fixed” stars. Such a system is known as a Newtonian, or inertial reference, frame. The laws are also valid in any set of rigid axes moving with constant velocity and without rotation relative to the inertial frame; this concept is known as the principle of Newtonian or Galilean relativity." I found this above sentence on Britannica but it just reinforces my point. From my understanding, the movement along the x,y,z$x,y,z$ planes is not the problem, it's the rotation.
Thus my question is: why should the inertial frame of reference not spin?
Why should the inertial frame of reference not spin?