Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

9
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm sorry, I know nothing about string theory. I'll wait for someone else to accept the challenge $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 28, 2021 at 20:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ see this post and links therein physics.stackexchange.com/questions/30005/… $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 28, 2021 at 20:29
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @SamCottle It has nothing to do with electromagnetism. Perturbative string theory automatically has massless spin-2 particles, and any reasonable theory with interacting massless spin-2 particles has gravity. For a nonperturbative perspective, the AdS/CFT correspondence is the most-studied framework so far. (That's not an answer, just a couple of sentences with keywords to point you in the right direction, because I don't think a one-post answer is feasible.) $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 28, 2021 at 20:57
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ What you might've read is that string theorists make use of dimensional reduction which was originally formalized as part of a different theory by Kaluza and Klein which attempted to unify gravitational and electromagnetic fields back when people thought these were the only two forces. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 28, 2021 at 20:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ChiralAnomaly even more basic the (assumed) vanishing of the beta functions imply Einstein Field equation (for vacuum) $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 28, 2021 at 21:36