Skip to main content

Timeline for Angular Displacement

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

23 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
Mar 16, 2014 at 4:47 comment added user31782 @EmilioPisanty I reworded my answer. How is it now from the view point of a reader?
Mar 15, 2014 at 8:48 history edited user31782 CC BY-SA 3.0
I Hope the reader will understand my answer now.
Mar 14, 2014 at 15:19 comment added Emilio Pisanty Note that I am not demanding that you change anything, I am explaining (since that is what you asked) why I find this post hard to follow. You need to place yourself in your reader's shoes if you ever want to understand these downvotes. My comments are as a reader and reflect some difficulties I, and possibly others, had with it. Is a 'complete' answer enough? Or is there some value to be had in proper structure, clear and concise text, and ease of access? Help your readers navigate your answers!
Mar 14, 2014 at 14:11 comment added user31782 This answer is complete in itself. I have written whole of the text of the reference article because it is not available on internet. The quoted established material is the fundamental answer to the question. There is no need of further explanation. References were asked - references have been given. Definition was asked - it has been given. This answer has some formatting errors which will be corrected tomorrow, I am not allowed to edit more today.
Mar 14, 2014 at 13:43 comment added Emilio Pisanty Try, for example, this type of approach.
Mar 14, 2014 at 12:49 comment added Emilio Pisanty Please re-read my comment. Yes, the answer is still confusing. You need to reference your sources, not make an answer that is made up entirely of quotes. The answer should be at the top, and you should then proceed to back it up with references.
Mar 14, 2014 at 12:47 comment added user31782 @EmilioPisanty The quotes are written because the OP asked for the definitions(with references) in his comments. I have edited my answer. If it is still confusing then tell me.
Mar 14, 2014 at 12:43 history edited user31782 CC BY-SA 3.0
Improved formatting.
Mar 14, 2014 at 12:09 comment added Emilio Pisanty This answer is confusing and it is hard to find the answer to the question inside a maze of quotes. While citing your sources is good, it is not very helpful to simply provide a wall of (pretty convoluted) text upfront. An alternative course of action, which may be easier to read, is to provide a clear answer that concisely answers the question, and which is visually easy to recognize, visibly separated from your sources. Additionally, it would help if each of your references was visually separated from the rest. The paragraphing is also very confusing and disorienting.
Nov 23, 2013 at 15:40 history edited user31782 CC BY-SA 3.0
done
Nov 23, 2013 at 15:35 history edited user31782 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 469 characters in body; Post Made Community Wiki
Nov 23, 2013 at 15:28 history edited user31782 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 469 characters in body
Nov 23, 2013 at 14:58 history edited user31782 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 27 characters in body
Nov 23, 2013 at 14:51 history edited user31782 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 192 characters in body
Nov 23, 2013 at 14:36 history edited user31782 CC BY-SA 3.0
working on
Nov 22, 2013 at 15:36 history edited user31782 CC BY-SA 3.0
under construction.
Nov 22, 2013 at 15:03 history edited user31782 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 533 characters in body
Nov 20, 2013 at 19:45 history edited user31782 CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 685 characters in body
Nov 20, 2013 at 18:49 history edited user31782 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 55 characters in body
Nov 20, 2013 at 14:12 history edited user31782 CC BY-SA 3.0
reanswered
Nov 19, 2013 at 13:46 history edited user31782 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 74 characters in body
Nov 19, 2013 at 10:32 history answered user31782 CC BY-SA 3.0