Linked Questions

27 votes
2 answers
3k views

The possibility of randomness in physics doesnt particularly bother me, but contemplating the possibility that quarks might be made up of something even smaller, just in general, leads me to think ...
J.Todd's user avatar
  • 1,841
12 votes
3 answers
3k views

In the special theory of relativity, each event is a point in 4d spacetime. And we can represent our life as a world line in the spacetime. Then, if we somehow find out the mathematical equation of ...
Gurbir Singh's user avatar
3 votes
6 answers
2k views

Suppose you know at time $t$ that there is some atomic nucleus that radioactively decays. If you were to magically roll back the universe to the exact same state and let it continue as per usual ...
Water's user avatar
  • 195
1 vote
5 answers
710 views

This would mean that every event happens because of what has hapened before it and there is no randomness factor. At a microscopic level, the motion of atoms is a result of the motion of other atoms ...
Creator's user avatar
  • 35
7 votes
3 answers
865 views

I am a physics high-school student so my knowledge is not very deep on the subject. We started learnning about quantum mechanics and on some processes that my teacher described as random. I began to ...
user3917631's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
1k views

Is there a general consensus about whether the universe is deterministic? Is it still up in the air? I have attempted to read other physics.stackexchange answers and do some independent research, but ...
temetvince's user avatar
0 votes
5 answers
2k views

Does Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle mean that the universe cannot deterministically be predicted by observers, or does it mean that the universe is inherently indeterministic, meaning that the ...
Peter Jordanson's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
3k views

By truly random I mean that IF we knew the position and velocity of every particle in radioactive isotope, could we predict when the decay would happen?
Jan's user avatar
  • 51
3 votes
3 answers
366 views

I often hear people say that quantum randomness is “true randomness”, but I don’t really understand it. Please bear with my question. Before the development of quantum physics, randomness is ...
J Li's user avatar
  • 131
1 vote
1 answer
608 views

According to classical physics if we know space-time coordinates of every atom in the universe, we can predict the future. But quantum physics introduced probability throwing determinism out of ...
siva phanindra Daggubati's user avatar
2 votes
3 answers
437 views

I am trying to understand what decides the outcome of an experiment and if there is any theory (e.g. non-local hidden variable theory) that is able to predict the outcome.
Rajaram Venkataramani's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
505 views

I am not a physicist but I've started studying the subject and noticed that terms like "random", "randomness", "randomly" are widely used when talking about nature. For example, random movement of ...
user avatar
0 votes
3 answers
426 views

In a simulation everything is known which makes any apparent random event a pre-calculated event. Taking that into account is it possible to simulate the universe with absolute accuracy in a way that ...
SMUsamaShah's user avatar
  • 5,517
-1 votes
2 answers
250 views

It is implied, per QM, that the behavior of subatomic particles cannot be precisely predicted. However, these indeterministic effects do have defined probabilities. By the law of large numbers, they ...
user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
250 views

Neurons fire depending on the impulses they get from other neurons. This seems to be 'deterministic'. However, sometimes it might be useful to use random processes instead. Does the human brain have ...
Riemann's user avatar
  • 1,595

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5