Timeline for Is it okay to use a short EULA?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2015 at 22:18 | answer | added | H2ONaCl | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 11:07 | comment | added | quant_dev | @JoeyAdams I'm not sure what is the point -- if they user cares about the contents of the EULA, they will have to read the full version anyway. | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 7:47 | answer | added | Simon | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 1:58 | history | edited | yannis | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 16 characters in body; edited tags |
| Sep 4, 2011 at 19:27 | comment | added | Joey Adams | Even if you end up using a long, comprehensive EULA, I think prefacing it with a tl;dr version like this is a very good idea. It makes reading, understanding, and adhering to the terms of agreement a reasonable feat. It shows respect for the user's time, intelligence, and trustworthiness. | |
| Sep 4, 2011 at 15:42 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/110377309172801536 | ||
| Sep 4, 2011 at 12:54 | answer | added | Caleb | timeline score: 27 | |
| Sep 4, 2011 at 12:51 | answer | added | Michael Borgwardt | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 4, 2011 at 12:09 | comment | added | amara | This isn't what you're looking for here, but the en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL seems relevant =) | |
| Sep 4, 2011 at 11:26 | answer | added | DeadMG | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 4, 2011 at 10:17 | comment | added | Saeed Neamati | I think this is a law question. But I like it. +1 @Laurent. | |
| Sep 4, 2011 at 10:10 | history | asked | laurent | CC BY-SA 3.0 |