Timeline for Is it okay to use a short EULA?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2011 at 6:24 | history | edited | Caleb | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Added last paragraph. |
| Sep 4, 2011 at 17:12 | comment | added | David Schwartz | @MainMa: That's silly. The license doesn't grant any rights to redistribute or sell. (And even if it said you couldn't, that wouldn't change anything, since such a person wouldn't agree to the EULA anyway.) | |
| Sep 4, 2011 at 16:35 | comment | added | seriousdev | Really? Are people that dumb? | |
| Sep 4, 2011 at 13:14 | comment | added | Caleb | @MainMa: Great point -- I've added something to that effect. | |
| Sep 4, 2011 at 13:14 | history | edited | Caleb | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Incorporated suggestion for line 2. |
| Sep 4, 2011 at 12:59 | comment | added | Arseni Mourzenko | +1. You may also add that "If you buy a license, you may not redistribute it or sell it" would also mean that if I don't buy a license, and I get the software product from a P2P, I now can redistribute or sell it, accordingly to the license. | |
| Sep 4, 2011 at 12:54 | history | answered | Caleb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |