Timeline for How to handle fired listeners exceptions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2011 at 14:43 | comment | added | Marjan Venema | @mP01: Uh, where did I use those terms? | |
| Sep 17, 2011 at 10:53 | comment | added | mP01 | Sorry i hate the terms observable and observer as they share too many similar letters and at a glance for me open for error. I prefer to terms for both ends that are very different and not merely different by some suffix. Thnx for the last thought. | |
| Sep 17, 2011 at 10:52 | vote | accept | mP01 | ||
| Sep 12, 2011 at 12:56 | comment | added | Marjan Venema | @mP01: No, not to my mind. A listener should not have that kind of power of whatever it listens to. And if it does need that power, throwing an exception from an event handler is not the way to abort any process it is listening to. | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 12:49 | comment | added | mP01 | Are there any real cases where it makes sense that a listener can "abort" the current process which is why it threw the ex in the first place ? | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 6:47 | history | answered | Marjan Venema | CC BY-SA 3.0 |