Timeline for What does SVN do better than Git?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2019 at 16:54 | comment | added | Erik Aronesty | @WarrenT a single developer pushing to a single feature branch and pushing a pull req, and then merging to master can and will get conflicts nearly every time if they forget to pull before working again. for simple workflows git can seem insane and thats why it breaks brains. even for many devs.. as long as there's a central master everyone is pull-req to, git comes up with bizarre conflicts for no easily discernible reason. | |
| May 7, 2018 at 16:06 | comment | added | Luke | I love your last idea, Git broke my brain :'( | |
| Sep 28, 2017 at 17:23 | comment | added | jgmjgm | Deleting everything and checking out again will clean unversioned files. | |
| Dec 25, 2013 at 23:35 | history | edited | Peter Mortensen | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Copy edited. |
| Nov 16, 2013 at 15:10 | comment | added | Warren P | Tree conflicts? Check. Yes or no to all options? No. Svn is designed to infuriate. Clean working copy command? No. Revert cannot clean unversioned files. | |
| Aug 30, 2012 at 23:23 | comment | added | WarrenT | "Better" tools / front-ends, that's a moving target. Tools improve on both sides. None of us know what tools will be available several years from now. That assessment 10 months ago might easily change over time, and might be stale now. I would prefer to see substantive answers. | |
| Aug 30, 2012 at 23:17 | comment | added | WarrenT | Doesn't break your brain? Wanna teach me how to easily merge branches with conflicts in SVN? | |
| Jun 5, 2012 at 15:51 | history | edited | Keith Thompson | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Spelling, grammar |
| Oct 1, 2011 at 15:32 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by sje397 | ||
| Sep 30, 2011 at 12:54 | history | answered | Lazy Badger | CC BY-SA 3.0 |