Timeline for VB.Net vs C# debate
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2011 at 16:58 | comment | added | Simon P Stevens | @Thomas @WeekendWarrior: Good examples, but just to point out, I said "Functionally the same", which they are. They both compile to IL, so the same set of functionality is achievable. These examples are just language shortcuts for functionality that can be achieved in other ways. | |
| Mar 17, 2011 at 15:39 | comment | added | Anonymous Apple | C# doesn't have VB.NET's XML literals: blogs.msdn.com/b/wriju/archive/2008/02/07/… (although I am not a fan of the feature for architectural reasons, it IS cool) | |
| Oct 18, 2010 at 0:49 | comment | added | Thomas Levesque | It's not entirely true: for instance, VB.NET doesn't have iterators, which are a great C# feature. | |
| Sep 7, 2010 at 10:32 | history | edited | Simon P Stevens | CC BY-SA 2.5 | added 194 characters in body; added 12 characters in body |
| Sep 7, 2010 at 10:27 | history | answered | Simon P Stevens | CC BY-SA 2.5 |