Return to Question

What is the best way to evaluate the best candidates to get a new job (talking merely in terms of programming skills)? In my company we have had a lot of bad experiences with people who have good grades but do not have real programming skills. Their skills are merely like code monkeys, without the ability to analyze the problems and find solutions.

More things that I have to note:

• The education system in my country sucks--really sucks. The people that are good in this kind of job are good because they have talent for it or really try to learn on their own.

• The university / graduate /post-grad degree doesn't mean necessarily that you know exactly how to do the things.

• Certifications also mean nothing here because the people in charge of the certification course also don't have skills (or are in low paying jobs).

We need really to get the good candidates that are flexible and don't have mechanical thinking (because this type of people by experience have a low performance).

We are in a government institution and the people that are candidates don't necessarily come from outside, but we have the possibility to accept or not any candidates until we find the correct one.

I hope I'm not sounding too aggressive in my question; and BTW I'm a programmer myself.

edit: I figured out that asked something really complex here. I will un-toggle "the correct answer" only to let the discussion going fluent, without any bias.

What is the best way to evaluate the best candidates to get a new job (talking merely in terms of programming skills)? In my company we have had a lot of bad experiences with people who have good grades but do not have real programming skills. Their skills are merely like code monkeys, without the ability to analyze the problems and find solutions.

More things that I have to note:

• The education system in my country sucks--really sucks. The people that are good in this kind of job are good because they have talent for it or really try to learn on their own.

• The university / graduate /post-grad degree doesn't mean necessarily that you know exactly how to do the things.

• Certifications also mean nothing here because the people in charge of the certification course also don't have skills (or are in low paying jobs).

We need really to get the good candidates that are flexible and don't have mechanical thinking (because this type of people by experience have a low performance).

We are in a government institution and the people that are candidates don't necessarily come from outside, but we have the possibility to accept or not any candidates until we find the correct one.

What is the best way to evaluate the best candidates to get a new job (talking merely in terms of programming skills)? In my company we have had a lot of bad experiences with people who have good grades but do not have real programming skills. Their skills are merely like code monkeys, without the ability to analyze the problems and find solutions.

More things that I have to note:

• The education system in my country sucks--really sucks. The people that are good in this kind of job are good because they have talent for it or really try to learn on their own.

• The university / graduate /post-grad degree doesn't mean necessarily that you know exactly how to do the things.

• Certifications also mean nothing here because the people in charge of the certification course also don't have skills (or are in low paying jobs).

We need really to get the good candidates that are flexible and don't have mechanical thinking (because this type of people by experience have a low performance).

We are in a government institution and the people that are candidates don't necessarily come from outside, but we have the possibility to accept or not any candidates until we find the correct one.

I hope I'm not sounding too aggressive in my question; and BTW I'm a programmer myself.

edit: I figured out that asked something really complex here. I will un-toggle "the correct answer" only to let the discussion going fluent, without any bias.

What is the best way to evaluate the best candidates to get a new job (talking merely in terms of programming skills)? In my company we have had a lot of bad experiences with people who have good grades but do not have real programming skills. Their skills are merely like code monkeys, without the ability to analyze the problems and find solutions.

More things that I have to note:

• The education system in my country sucks--really sucks. The people that are good in this kind of job are good because they have talent for it or really try to learn on their own.

• The university / graduate /post-grad degree doesn't mean necessarily that you know exactly how to do the things.

• Certifications also mean nothing here because the people in charge of the certification course also don't have skills (or are in low paying jobs).

We need really to get the good candidates that are flexible and don't have mechanical thinking (because this type of people by experience have a low performance).

We are in a government institution and the people that are candidates don't necessarily come from outside, but we have the possibility to accept or not any candidates until we find the correct one.

I hope I'm not sounding too aggressive in my question; and BTW I'm a programmer myself.

edit: I figured out that asked something really complex here. I will un-toggle "the correct answer" only to let the discussion going fluent, without any bias.