Timeline for What is the best way to evaluate new programmers? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
36 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2021 at 12:45 | history | edited | Robert Harvey | CC BY-SA 4.0 | deleted 266 characters in body |
| Mar 27, 2016 at 13:42 | history | edited | gnat | http://meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/7285/structured-tag-cleanup-initiative-phase-ii | |
| Oct 31, 2013 at 16:59 | history | closed | CommunityBot gnat Bart van Ingen Schenau Michael Kohne | Opinion-based | |
| Oct 31, 2013 at 3:09 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 31, 2013 at 16:59 | |||||
| Oct 30, 2013 at 21:16 | history | protected | CommunityBot | ||
| Oct 30, 2013 at 21:07 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Nos | ||
| Nov 24, 2012 at 23:36 | comment | added | alan2here | I'd value creativity, as you say regarding code monkeying. I don't like the brute force approach, if generations of past programmers have used a given approach, it might mean it's great, or just that it's been perpetuated for a long time. Also education is not supposed to focus on trade skills, and i'd say it's super important but put the actual grades acquired beyond a basic competent level as not so important. I'd love to see more of a Khan Academy style system of many small pass/fail modules with other module pass dependencies and a cool-down period before being allowed to retake a module. | |
| Mar 21, 2012 at 15:02 | answer | added | HLGEM | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 21, 2012 at 13:08 | answer | added | Clay Nichols | timeline score: 14 | |
| Jan 19, 2012 at 13:34 | history | edited | Rafael | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 7 characters in body |
| Jan 19, 2012 at 13:32 | vote | accept | Rafael | ||
| Jan 7, 2012 at 20:23 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Jan 7, 2012 at 20:26 | |||||
| Jan 5, 2012 at 14:47 | answer | added | JeffO | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 5, 2012 at 14:12 | history | edited | Rafael | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 3 characters in body |
| Jan 5, 2012 at 13:59 | history | edited | Rafael | CC BY-SA 3.0 | opinion expressed at the end |
| Jan 5, 2012 at 8:11 | answer | added | Priyadarshi Kunal | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 4, 2012 at 21:22 | answer | added | Harold Bamford | timeline score: 1 | |
| S Jan 4, 2012 at 14:07 | history | suggested | UtopiaLtd | CC BY-SA 3.0 | minor spelling corrections, verb agreement tweaks, etc. |
| Jan 4, 2012 at 14:05 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 4, 2012 at 14:07 | |||||
| Jan 4, 2012 at 11:30 | answer | added | S.Robins | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 4, 2012 at 7:35 | answer | added | user2528 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 5:24 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/147547671685640192 | ||
| Dec 15, 2011 at 18:01 | answer | added | hotpaw2 | timeline score: 9 | |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 17:26 | answer | added | SHOUBHIK BOSE | timeline score: -1 | |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 16:56 | answer | added | BЈовић | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 15:49 | vote | accept | Rafael | ||
| Jan 5, 2012 at 14:00 | |||||
| Dec 15, 2011 at 15:19 | history | edited | c_maker | CC BY-SA 3.0 | capitalized title |
| S Dec 15, 2011 at 15:12 | history | suggested | Richard | CC BY-SA 3.0 | I may have overwritten your changes, but I also improved some of the grammar. |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 15:11 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 15, 2011 at 15:12 | |||||
| Dec 15, 2011 at 15:10 | history | edited | Rafael | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Uppercase |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 15:04 | answer | added | Matthieu | timeline score: 53 | |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 15:01 | answer | added | CaffGeek | timeline score: 15 | |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 14:57 | answer | added | jfrankcarr | timeline score: 7 | |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 14:44 | history | edited | Rafael | CC BY-SA 3.0 | edited body |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 14:43 | answer | added | Oded | timeline score: 20 | |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 14:38 | history | asked | Rafael | CC BY-SA 3.0 |