I have been working on a project comprising of databases, and I recently received a bug report for the remote execution of some queries.

Usually, you try to find out the actual cause for the bug to occur and then fix it.
But sometimes what I do when I'm fed up of doing some research (and can't find suitable information on the internet) is just change the logic, which takes me much less time compared to the other option.

Is this approach correct, or should I try to fix the original bug involving more R&D?

I have been working on a database project, and I recently received a bug report for the remote execution of some queries.

Usually, you try to find out the actual cause for the bug to occur and then fix it.
But sometimes what I do when I'm fed up of doing some research (and can't find suitable information on the internet) is just change the logic, which takes me much less time compared to the other option.

Is this approach correct, or should I try to fix the original bug involving more R&D?

I have been working on a project comprising of databases.
I recently received a bug report for the remote execution of some queries.

Usually you try to find out the actual cause for the bug to occur and then fix it.
But sometimes what I do when I'm fed up of doing some research (and can't find suitable information on the internet) is just change the logic, which takes me much less time compared to the other option.

Is this approach of mine correct or should I try to fix the original bug involving more R&D?

I have been working on a project comprising of databases, and I recently received a bug report for the remote execution of some queries.

Usually, you try to find out the actual cause for the bug to occur and then fix it.
But sometimes what I do when I'm fed up of doing some research (and can't find suitable information on the internet) is just change the logic, which takes me much less time compared to the other option.

Is this approach correct, or should I try to fix the original bug involving more R&D?

I have been working on a project comprising of databases.
I was recently reported a bug for remote execution of some queries.

Usually you try to find out the actual cause for the bug to occur then fix it.
But sometimes what I do is fed up of doing some research (cant find suitable information on the internet) I just change the logic which takes me much less time as compared to the other.

Is this approach of mine correct or should I try to fix the original bug involving more Rn D.

I have been working on a project comprising of databases.
I recently received a bug report for the remote execution of some queries.

Usually you try to find out the actual cause for the bug to occur and then fix it.
But sometimes what I do when I'm fed up of doing some research (and can't find suitable information on the internet) is just change the logic, which takes me much less time compared to the other option.

Is this approach of mine correct or should I try to fix the original bug involving more R&D?