Timeline for test coverage reality
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Dec 6, 2012 at 15:15 | history | suggested | assylias | CC BY-SA 3.0 | minor typos |
| Dec 6, 2012 at 15:03 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 6, 2012 at 15:15 | |||||
| Oct 31, 2012 at 14:19 | comment | added | Michael Borgwardt | 100% coverage with no asserts still tests the absence of (uncaught) exceptions, which can be quite valuable. | |
| Oct 31, 2012 at 9:21 | comment | added | jk. | We ensure that tests actually test stuff properly by including them in code review. As with any metric, coverage alone is less useful than coverage coupled with other checks and measures | |
| Jul 10, 2012 at 14:08 | history | edited | Matthew Flynn | CC BY-SA 3.0 | corrected spelling; deleted 2 characters in body |
| Jul 10, 2012 at 8:17 | vote | accept | Spring | ||
| Jul 10, 2012 at 7:55 | history | answered | simoraman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |