Skip to main content
typo
Source Link
lwm
  • 895
  • 1
  • 5
  • 12

Remember, legacy code is still legacy code for a reason. It works, and it's too complicated and large scale to correctly replace. Sometimes a new shiny version is not the best option. For example, python 3 caused a bit of a stir over compatibility.

In practice, some things to remember :

  • Replace deprecated methods
  • New language optimisations may provide better ways to do thingsomething, check the chagelogs
  • Dependecies/Compatabilty, what is your application interacting with?

Remember, legacy code is still legacy code for a reason. It works, and it's too complicated and large scale to correctly replace. Sometimes a new shiny version is not the best option. For example, python 3 caused a bit of a stir over compatibility.

In practice, some things to remember :

  • Replace deprecated methods
  • New language optimisations may provide better ways to do thing, check the chagelogs
  • Dependecies/Compatabilty, what is your application interacting with?

Remember, legacy code is still legacy code for a reason. It works, and it's too complicated and large scale to correctly replace. Sometimes a new shiny version is not the best option. For example, python 3 caused a bit of a stir over compatibility.

In practice, some things to remember :

  • Replace deprecated methods
  • New language optimisations may provide better ways to do something, check the chagelogs
  • Dependecies/Compatabilty, what is your application interacting with?
Source Link
lwm
  • 895
  • 1
  • 5
  • 12

Remember, legacy code is still legacy code for a reason. It works, and it's too complicated and large scale to correctly replace. Sometimes a new shiny version is not the best option. For example, python 3 caused a bit of a stir over compatibility.

In practice, some things to remember :

  • Replace deprecated methods
  • New language optimisations may provide better ways to do thing, check the chagelogs
  • Dependecies/Compatabilty, what is your application interacting with?