Timeline for What "sublicense" actually means?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jan 23, 2015 at 1:24 | history | suggested | waldyrious | CC BY-SA 3.0 | fix typos and clarify some passages |
| Jan 23, 2015 at 0:32 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 23, 2015 at 1:24 | |||||
| Mar 9, 2013 at 0:00 | comment | added | Chris Travers | (I am also not really sure that sublicensing is ever all that necessary regarding open source software, FWIW.) | |
| Mar 9, 2013 at 0:00 | comment | added | Chris Travers | To some extent yes. But I am also of the opinion that as professionals we need to be relatively informed of these issues. If the only question is "can I use MIT-licensed code in my GPL'd app" that can be answered safely as "yes." If the question is "can I link my proprietary application to a GPL'd version of an MIT-licensed library?" that's a good time to talk to a lawyer. | |
| Mar 8, 2013 at 19:40 | comment | added | Robert Harvey | tl;dr: Talk to a lawyer. | |
| Mar 8, 2013 at 6:50 | history | edited | Chris Travers | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 1143 characters in body |
| Mar 8, 2013 at 6:38 | history | answered | Chris Travers | CC BY-SA 3.0 |