Skip to main content
added 177 characters in body
Source Link
Ripped Off
  • 3.8k
  • 3
  • 24
  • 24

Been calling them "implementers", but it seems weird to me.

/// <summary> /// Implementers should implement this. Derp /// </summary> protected abstract void InternalExecute(); 

A point of clarification, I'm interested in what to call the people who create child classes, not the child classes themselves.

"Hey, you there" not "that thing there."

Been calling them "implementers", but it seems weird to me.

/// <summary> /// Implementers should implement this. Derp /// </summary> protected abstract void InternalExecute(); 

Been calling them "implementers", but it seems weird to me.

/// <summary> /// Implementers should implement this. Derp /// </summary> protected abstract void InternalExecute(); 

A point of clarification, I'm interested in what to call the people who create child classes, not the child classes themselves.

"Hey, you there" not "that thing there."

Source Link
Ripped Off
  • 3.8k
  • 3
  • 24
  • 24

What do I call people who extend my class in base class documentation?

Been calling them "implementers", but it seems weird to me.

/// <summary> /// Implementers should implement this. Derp /// </summary> protected abstract void InternalExecute();