Timeline for Does bootstrapping limit the achievable speed of the new compiler?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2022 at 14:29 | answer | added | gnasher729 | timeline score: 0 | |
| S Jun 17, 2022 at 13:15 | history | suggested | blunova | CC BY-SA 4.0 | corrected spelling |
| May 30, 2022 at 8:15 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 17, 2022 at 13:15 | |||||
| Apr 12, 2017 at 7:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced https://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Feb 20, 2015 at 18:14 | comment | added | supercat | @RobertHarvey: That depends on the assembler and linking platform. While nearly any platform would allow one to express fixed-address code as a series of define-data directives (indeed, on many platforms one could even do that in C), I've seen some embedded platforms where the linker was responsible for generating or adjusting bank-switching code, and code written as linker-opaque data-define directives would interact badly with that. | |
| Jan 16, 2014 at 10:47 | history | edited | Profpatsch | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Made the questions more recognizable. |
| Jan 16, 2014 at 10:03 | comment | added | SK-logic | It's hard to guess what are you actually talking about, but, take a look at Tachyon and PyPy. | |
| Jan 15, 2014 at 21:49 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/423572691564900352 | ||
| Jan 15, 2014 at 19:25 | answer | added | BrianH | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jan 15, 2014 at 19:00 | answer | added | user7043 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 15, 2014 at 18:42 | comment | added | Robert Harvey | Yeah, assembly language is essentially machine language. There's a one-to-one mapping between the instructions in assembly language source and the underlying machine instructions. | |
| Jan 15, 2014 at 18:42 | answer | added | herby | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 15, 2014 at 18:40 | comment | added | user7043 | @herby Assembly is essentially a different spelling for machine code in that you can make the assembler generate pretty much any machine code possible. | |
| Jan 15, 2014 at 18:38 | comment | added | user7043 | Are you talking about the speed at which the compiler runs, or the speed at which code generated by the compiler runs? | |
| Jan 15, 2014 at 18:38 | comment | added | herby | Assembler is not as low as you can get. Machine code is lower. ;-) | |
| Jan 15, 2014 at 18:33 | answer | added | Robert Harvey | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jan 15, 2014 at 18:27 | history | asked | Profpatsch | CC BY-SA 3.0 |