Timeline for Engineering a better solution, coming from existing codebase [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2014 at 22:25 | comment | added | gnat | related: What is the most effective way to add functionality to unfamiliar, structurally unsound code? | |
| Feb 25, 2014 at 18:17 | comment | added | yannis | @Dennis Re-engineer, in context, essentially means re-factoring. | |
| Feb 14, 2014 at 15:10 | comment | added | Dennis | the answers and linked questions are great in theory. I am facing a more specific situation, now trying to decide whether to port the application to ZF2 or just do a refactor, and how to do it. I suppose P.SE may not be the best forum for my specific inquiry, because it addresses the question from very abstract levels. programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/6268/… may help but I do not know what they mean by "re-engineer", and I can't make comment w/o having reputation of 50. | |
| Feb 11, 2014 at 9:53 | history | closed | CommunityBot mattnz gnat ozz | Duplicate of To rewrite or slowly refactor old C++ project [duplicate] | |
| Feb 11, 2014 at 9:49 | answer | added | AlexT | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 23:41 | comment | added | mattnz | Please use the search function (key words "Legacy" and "Ball of Mud" come to mind), this has to be the most commonly asked and answered question . | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 22:57 | answer | added | ptyx | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 22:27 | answer | added | rucamzu | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 22:27 | review | Close votes | |||
| S Feb 11, 2014 at 9:57 | |||||
| Feb 10, 2014 at 22:22 | review | First posts | |||
| S Feb 11, 2014 at 9:57 | |||||
| Feb 10, 2014 at 22:03 | history | asked | Dennis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |