Timeline for How to enrich a simple two endpoint SOAP application to become enterprise level?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2014 at 12:11 | answer | added | Revious | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 24, 2014 at 10:56 | vote | accept | Revious | ||
| S Feb 24, 2014 at 10:55 | history | bounty ended | Revious | ||
| S Feb 24, 2014 at 10:55 | history | notice removed | Revious | ||
| Feb 18, 2014 at 20:51 | comment | added | Wyatt Barnett | @Sam -- you missed the sarcasm there I think, SOAP is generally viewed as bloated and enterprise-worthy round these parts. Now the question of being "enterprise grade" being a good thing is also an interesting one of the sort that would get closed here. | |
| Feb 18, 2014 at 19:56 | comment | added | Revious | @WyattBarnett: but in practice SOAP is just adding some kind of header to the simple XML message which I got calling directly the WS? How can I exploit it to transform my structure into something enterprise grade? | |
| Feb 18, 2014 at 17:01 | comment | added | Wyatt Barnett | I would think SOAP gets you to enterprise grade these days. | |
| Feb 18, 2014 at 16:16 | answer | added | bennie j | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 18, 2014 at 13:50 | comment | added | Revious | ps: have also a look here: codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/41961/… | |
| Feb 18, 2014 at 13:49 | comment | added | Revious | @Rig: the 3rd party is called with some parameters which they will send back to my infrastructure so I can use this and the datetime to identify the requests. | |
| Feb 18, 2014 at 3:19 | comment | added | rlperez | Do you need state explicitly or could you pass around transaction Ids that can be passed to identify a request? Or even an API key to identify the particular requester? | |
| Feb 17, 2014 at 16:55 | comment | added | Revious | @Rig: I've tried to explain better my need and my consideration. Feel free to ask me to specify better or clarify in any way. | |
| Feb 17, 2014 at 16:51 | history | edited | Revious | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 21 characters in body |
| Feb 17, 2014 at 16:48 | comment | added | rlperez | Let us know more about your concerns. At the highest level this looks fine but there is much more to being enterprise grade. | |
| Feb 17, 2014 at 16:42 | history | edited | Revious | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 21 characters in body |
| Feb 17, 2014 at 16:27 | comment | added | जलजनक | facing this kind of issue? what issue? you're still contemplating over the design part. | |
| Feb 17, 2014 at 13:39 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/435408094261436416 | ||
| S Feb 17, 2014 at 11:25 | history | bounty started | Revious | ||
| S Feb 17, 2014 at 11:25 | history | notice added | Revious | Draw attention | |
| Feb 15, 2014 at 13:31 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 16, 2014 at 12:49 | |||||
| Feb 11, 2014 at 13:31 | comment | added | Revious | I will be working on it for the next days. I'll give a self answer to share my errors and success. | |
| Feb 11, 2014 at 13:27 | comment | added | gnat | Sharing your research helps everyone. Tell us what you've tried and why it didn’t meet your needs. This demonstrates that you’ve taken the time to try to help yourself, it saves us from reiterating obvious answers, and most of all it helps you get a more specific and relevant answer. Also see How to Ask | |
| Feb 11, 2014 at 13:14 | history | asked | Revious | CC BY-SA 3.0 |