Timeline for Did the gradual shift in methodology of writing code affect system performance? And Should I care?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2014 at 12:51 | comment | added | svick | For the record, I wasn't the one who downvoted this answer. | |
| Mar 6, 2014 at 7:42 | comment | added | user949300 | Wow, a downvote? Original Client code didn't deal with Double.NaNs, but was checking for nulls to represent empty values. After restructure, we could handle this (via encapsulation) with the getters of the various algorithm results. Sure, we could have rewritten the client code, but this was easier. | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 12:03 | comment | added | svick | I don't see why would switching from Doubles to doubles require better structured code. | |
| Feb 26, 2014 at 7:06 | history | edited | user949300 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 138 characters in body |
| Feb 26, 2014 at 1:47 | history | answered | user949300 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |