Timeline for Is duplicate syntax for defining named functions a bad language design decision?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
2 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2014 at 8:19 | comment | added | jcora | It is valid in Scala, it mostly works the same, but it does not mean the same thing - and if you'd make more complex examples (type polymorphism is not available for anonymous functions e.g.) - the differences would become more apparent. | |
| Jun 21, 2014 at 0:45 | history | answered | Daenyth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |