Timeline for Naming conventions: camelCase versus underscore_case ? what are your thoughts about it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2012 at 18:18 | comment | added | supercat | I like to use underscores to separate parts of a name which have semantically-disjoint purposes, especially if commonality on either half may be significant. For example, the routines Motor1_Start(), Motor2_Start(), Motor1_Stop() and Motor2_Stop() have a relationship that might be less clear without the underscores. | |
| Jan 6, 2011 at 21:09 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki | ||
| Dec 17, 2010 at 9:35 | comment | added | Gauthier | As long as the convention is well defined (prefix + underscore + PascalCase)... | |
| Dec 17, 2010 at 9:33 | comment | added | poelinca | +1 for the last 2 lines , however i do not recomend you combine naming conventions , you should stick with one or the other . | |
| Dec 17, 2010 at 9:26 | history | answered | Gauthier | CC BY-SA 2.5 |