Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

4
  • 8
    +1 Haskell's type system can be your friend once you get used to it. Commented Dec 22, 2010 at 13:24
  • "To do that, you need a static type system". Really? Commented Feb 25, 2012 at 19:51
  • 1
    "all the more interesting when compared to the type systems of C++ and OCaml". Have you studied OCaml's first-class higher-order modules and structurally typed inferred object system and polymorphic variants? Commented Feb 25, 2012 at 19:53
  • 2
    @JonHarrop or an effect system or some way of measuring/evaluating purity. Yep, that's why it's interesting to compare them. Different choices make for different languages. Commented Feb 25, 2012 at 20:23