Timeline for Is order of arguments in an arithmetic expression important to achieve as most exact result as possible (speed is not necessary)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/ | |
| Sep 21, 2015 at 6:49 | comment | added | Mp0int | Ok @Brandin I fixed it to remove confusion and misleading (: | |
| Sep 21, 2015 at 6:49 | history | edited | Mp0int | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 6 characters in body |
| Sep 18, 2015 at 9:49 | comment | added | Brandin | The page you link to is a question ("Is floating point math broken"), but when you link to it you've turned it into a statement, as if to support a claim. It didn't seem like humour but who knows. I've got no sense of it. | |
| Sep 18, 2015 at 9:37 | comment | added | Mp0int | @Brandin I know it is not broken, it is just a dark humour I like to use since many developers who do not know how float got calculated stumbled that thought (You probably did not notice that I use the Question title as the link text). I try to explain it in a few words (since that is already told in those articles and I see no reason to told the whole story while giving the related links) but I guess they would not seem enough for you. | |
| Sep 18, 2015 at 9:18 | comment | added | Brandin | You link to the thread "Is floating point math broken" but apparently didn't even read the information there. Floating point math is not "broken" is the conclusion of reading that article and the others you linked to. | |
| Sep 18, 2015 at 8:19 | history | answered | Mp0int | CC BY-SA 3.0 |