Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 26, 2016 at 13:55 history tweeted twitter.com/StackProgrammer/status/735831619773313024
May 25, 2016 at 11:31 answer added John McClean timeline score: 5
May 24, 2016 at 19:19 vote accept Noel Yap
May 12, 2016 at 0:24 review Close votes
May 26, 2016 at 3:02
May 11, 2016 at 17:52 comment added Robert Harvey While the ability for rx to catch specific exceptions is nice, you can still do that with your own code using the other framework, so I don't find the distinction all that remarkable. They're both monads; it's just that rx provides you the additional convenience of handling existing exceptions.
May 11, 2016 at 17:41 answer added Karl Bielefeldt timeline score: 8
May 11, 2016 at 17:36 comment added Noel Yap @VincentSavard, I've changed the title.
May 11, 2016 at 17:34 comment added Noel Yap @RobertHarvey, AFAIK, exceptions are thrown by the called function when using 'rx' Try. I've amended the question to add that qualification.
May 11, 2016 at 17:32 history edited Noel Yap CC BY-SA 3.0
added 46 characters in body
May 11, 2016 at 16:25 comment added Robert Harvey @Noel: According to github.com/aol/cyclops/wiki/…, it doesn't throw exceptions; it wraps error handling in a monad. So neither of your definitions throws exceptions.
May 11, 2016 at 16:24 comment added Vincent Savard @RobertHarvey I think it is as well, I just dislike the title.
May 11, 2016 at 16:23 comment added Robert Harvey @VincentSavard: This question seems sufficiently constrained in scope to be answerable Q&A style.
May 11, 2016 at 16:23 comment added Robert Harvey I would think that the pros and cons are the same as those of throwing exceptions vs. not throwing exceptions.
May 11, 2016 at 16:23 comment added Vincent Savard Just wait until gnat appears and post his link about why pros and cons make bad questions
May 11, 2016 at 16:11 review First posts
May 17, 2016 at 22:00
May 11, 2016 at 16:09 history asked Noel Yap CC BY-SA 3.0