Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

4
  • 2
    "Present it as neutrally as you can" .. quite. I would go further than NeilS and suggest, as they say, you need to swap "anger for talk". Just instantly and openly say (for example, in the specific example at hand), "Steve, your corner case is non-physical with the current mechanical design, don't you think dude? Let's first decide on whether it's non-physical, and even if it is whether it's worth spending two days on." Commented Feb 5, 2017 at 13:27
  • 1
    "If you are using a review tool" is a key observation. IME, these tools are adequate for keeping a record of the review, but the real work gets done face-to-face with discussion. It's the most efficient way for a two-way flow of information. If you disagree with a review, have that disagreement constructively in person, and only then enter the agreed outcome into the tool. Commented Feb 6, 2017 at 10:56
  • @TobySpeight: I agree and tried to incorporate that into the answer. Commented Feb 6, 2017 at 11:24
  • 1
    2 hours is more what I would not fight. 2 days and I'm not going to be able to finish all of the other tasks I've committed to for the week. Commented Feb 6, 2017 at 23:43