Timeline for Why combining getters, setters and private access modifier is not enough to hide implementation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2017 at 19:53 | comment | added | Michael Shaw | @Billal BEGUERADJ: I think the reason it wasn't upvoted much has to do mostly with visibility. The question was originally asked 14 days ago, and I didn't see it until 2 days ago, so for 12 days, anyone reading the question and its answers couldn't have upvoted my answer because it didn't exist yet. After that, it was one of many answers, some long, and it was sorted towards the bottom by default. | |
| May 8, 2017 at 11:14 | comment | added | Doc Brown | @BillalBEGUERADJ: don't mind, IMHO your question, though probably not beeing crystal-clear, motivated some nice answers, and it is perfectly ok not to accept the one with the most upvotes. But you asked why this answer did not get more upvotes, so I tried to give you an explanation. | |
| May 8, 2017 at 10:40 | comment | added | Billal BEGUERADJ | When I started the bounty, I clearly stated through its description I read the existing answers including the full 2 PDF files provided by the user you mentioned. I carefully read all the answers and upvoted all of them (by principle, I upvote any person who answers to me even when I do not agree with him/her because that is a way for me to show that I respect them for their effort). But really I find this answer helps me to see the things better. I apologize from other users who answered me for not being enough clear through my question. @DocBrown | |
| May 8, 2017 at 9:58 | comment | added | Doc Brown | @BillalBEGUERADJ: well, I think I understand perfectly what happened here: your question is IMHO very unclear, and it provokes guessing around about the issues you have with the cite from "Clean Code". This answer just guessed correctly what you meant, JörgWMittag guessed probably wrong and tried to give you a more broader, theoretical answer. | |
| May 8, 2017 at 6:57 | vote | accept | Billal BEGUERADJ | ||
| May 8, 2017 at 6:57 | history | bounty awarded | Billal BEGUERADJ | ||
| May 8, 2017 at 6:55 | comment | added | Billal BEGUERADJ | I do not understand why your answer is not upvoted. Only your answer and that of Erik addressed my question. Other answers discussed things I did not ask for. I read the whole book I mentioned and I understood the statement I quoted almost exactly as you described it here. I wish I could divide the bounty between you and Erik but since I can not and your answer seems to clearly read in the author's mind, I opt to reward it for you. Thank you very much for the effort. I also thank all other members for their feedback. | |
| May 6, 2017 at 2:15 | history | answered | Michael Shaw | CC BY-SA 3.0 |