Timeline for How should training activities be handled in Agile/Scrum
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2021 at 12:27 | history | protected | gnat | ||
| Sep 14, 2017 at 21:13 | vote | accept | Robbie Dee | ||
| Aug 19, 2017 at 9:17 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSoftEng/status/898836397595013122 | ||
| Aug 18, 2017 at 15:26 | answer | added | Bryan Oakley | timeline score: 10 | |
| Aug 18, 2017 at 10:56 | answer | added | Thomas Owens♦ | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 18, 2017 at 10:44 | answer | added | Bart van Ingen Schenau | timeline score: 6 | |
| Aug 18, 2017 at 9:53 | history | edited | Robbie Dee | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 1 character in body |
| Aug 18, 2017 at 9:32 | comment | added | amon | In the context of Scrum, I don't think training tasks should be part of a sprint because training doesn't deliver value to users. Explicitly reducing the team velocity/capacity of a sprint might be more sensible to make the necessary time available. But not all learning has to be scheduled: If devs have to work with an unfamiliar technology this difficulty should be reflected in the estimate – that's not inflating the estimate, it's being realistic. (Comment, not an answer because these are my thoughts, not a authoritatively sourced answer about the Scrum Process). | |
| Aug 18, 2017 at 9:09 | history | edited | Robbie Dee | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 15 characters in body |
| Aug 18, 2017 at 8:58 | history | asked | Robbie Dee | CC BY-SA 3.0 |