Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

8
  • 1
    Maybe many programmers don't copy/paste actual code on a large scale, but they will happily leverage a ready-made library (free or otherwise) without looking at a single line of code... Commented Jan 15, 2011 at 4:52
  • 2
    @Stuart True, but I think the distinction there is that that library wouldn't be claimed as the programmer's own work. And honestly, so long as the library works and does what I need it to do, I don't particularly care to pore over its source either. (Assuming due diligence is otherwise done on how reputable/reliable the library is in the first place.) Commented Jan 15, 2011 at 5:15
  • In a way it's a matter of intent, both on the part of the publisher and the consumer :) Commented Jan 15, 2011 at 5:18
  • @stuart - I wouldn't include a library in this discussion as it's a cohesive unit ... not really 'lose' code, if you know what I mean. Commented Jan 15, 2011 at 7:25
  • Actually thinking about your comments, I honestly have to wonder if its possible for a programmer to cut & paste a complete system together. I think the weight of their hubris would quickly avalanche, crushing their progress to a standstill. Commented Jan 15, 2011 at 7:28