Timeline for Why do people still say Java is slow?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2011 at 12:42 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by rjzii | ||
| Jul 16, 2011 at 3:01 | comment | added | Patrick Hughes | @Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen I really wish I could give you a +1 for that observation. | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 19:32 | comment | added | user1249 | Haskell is infinitely slower than Java for our main platform, because it is not ported to said platform, so Haskell sucks... | |
| Jan 22, 2011 at 17:11 | comment | added | user7043 | -1 digging up an old question and bashing a language with very lame arguments. Tell me if you want a detailed writeup about what's wrong with your reasoning. For starters, naming OO as the main reason it sucks is not very objective and the de facto performance of a JVM+JIT is very good, even if there are optimizations left out. | |
| Jan 22, 2011 at 16:34 | comment | added | TheLQ | I have absolutely no idea what your code does there. And if you say that an entire language is slow just because it can't do one small optimization then there are other problems here | |
| Jan 22, 2011 at 16:30 | history | answered | Yttrill | CC BY-SA 2.5 |