Timeline for How far can you push Object Oriented Programming?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2024 at 18:17 | comment | added | Corbin | @Ewan: To me, object-oriented programming is functional programming with message sending. It can be pure, it can have limited mutability, it can be statically/gradually typed. The biggest difference between e.g. E and OCaml is that OCaml doesn't have easy syntax for asynchronous message delivery. | |
| May 13, 2024 at 15:20 | comment | added | Ewan | I guess thats my second question, do you think functional programming is still OOP? surely they are different and you dont expect them to follow the same rules? | |
| May 13, 2024 at 15:05 | comment | added | Corbin | @Ewan: That's what I'm asking, yeah. Is it a getter to return something within one's closure? If so, isn't all of functional and combinatory programming excluded? | |
| May 13, 2024 at 8:43 | comment | added | Ewan | if we let "getters" include "functions that return state" surely E has getters? | |
| S May 13, 2024 at 0:36 | review | First answers | |||
| May 13, 2024 at 8:24 | |||||
| S May 13, 2024 at 0:36 | history | answered | Corbin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |