Timeline for What is the objective of unit testing?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2013 at 23:10 | history | edited | Restuta | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 1 characters in body |
| Mar 22, 2012 at 1:39 | comment | added | Restuta | Kind of, it is different from spell checking, so I would prefer not to use that analogy, but it is definitely should be a part of standard development process. | |
| Mar 22, 2012 at 1:36 | history | edited | Restuta | CC BY-SA 3.0 | edited body |
| Mar 21, 2012 at 12:58 | comment | added | Bryan Oakley | @Xhalent: unit testing doesn't add to the cost of development, it is an integral part, much like spell checking a document doesn't add to the cost of writing. Unit testing shouldn't be considered an optional extra step. It is part of what you do if you are a professional programmer. | |
| Jun 16, 2011 at 21:22 | history | migrated | from stackoverflow.com (revisions) | ||
| Jun 16, 2011 at 14:16 | comment | added | Restuta | Agree, added "and supporting" =) | |
| Jun 16, 2011 at 14:12 | comment | added | Xhalent | I think the real cost saver is over the lifetime of the application. It may actually add to the cost of development. | |
| Jun 16, 2011 at 14:02 | history | answered | Restuta | CC BY-SA 3.0 |