Timeline for When to delete a branch in Git
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2019 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSoftEng/status/1138551686660788224 | ||
| Aug 5, 2011 at 13:53 | vote | accept | Jo-Herman Haugholt | ||
| Jun 28, 2011 at 19:48 | answer | added | kubi | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 28, 2011 at 14:04 | comment | added | Rook | Herman - That really(!) depends on the user. For example, I used to keep those when I was working on some projects. I had a different branch for each project (asa a matter of fact, still do :) because some programs needed to be modified on a case by case basis. And I never know when I'm going to stumble onto a similar case again. Disk space is cheap nowadays. | |
| Jun 28, 2011 at 13:54 | answer | added | J.K. | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 28, 2011 at 13:07 | comment | added | Jo-Herman Haugholt | I should have mentioned, some of these branches won't be merged because they're covering special cases that are no longer needed. | |
| Jun 28, 2011 at 13:05 | answer | added | Rook | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jun 28, 2011 at 13:04 | answer | added | Apreche | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jun 28, 2011 at 12:57 | history | asked | Jo-Herman Haugholt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |