Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2023 Jun;618(7965):550-556.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06166-6. Epub 2023 Jun 7.

Northwest African Neolithic initiated by migrants from Iberia and Levant

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Northwest African Neolithic initiated by migrants from Iberia and Levant

Luciana G Simões et al. Nature. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

In northwestern Africa, lifestyle transitioned from foraging to food production around 7,400 years ago but what sparked that change remains unclear. Archaeological data support conflicting views: (1) that migrant European Neolithic farmers brought the new way of life to North Africa1-3 or (2) that local hunter-gatherers adopted technological innovations4,5. The latter view is also supported by archaeogenetic data6. Here we fill key chronological and archaeogenetic gaps for the Maghreb, from Epipalaeolithic to Middle Neolithic, by sequencing the genomes of nine individuals (to between 45.8- and 0.2-fold genome coverage). Notably, we trace 8,000 years of population continuity and isolation from the Upper Palaeolithic, via the Epipaleolithic, to some Maghrebi Neolithic farming groups. However, remains from the earliest Neolithic contexts showed mostly European Neolithic ancestry. We suggest that farming was introduced by European migrants and was then rapidly adopted by local groups. During the Middle Neolithic a new ancestry from the Levant appears in the Maghreb, coinciding with the arrival of pastoralism in the region, and all three ancestries blend together during the Late Neolithic. Our results show ancestry shifts in the Neolithization of northwestern Africa that probably mirrored a heterogeneous economic and cultural landscape, in a more multifaceted process than observed in other regions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Overview of ancient northwestern African genetic composition.
a, Geographic location of investigated archaeological sites. Symbol legend given in c. The map was generated using the open source QGIS Geographic Information System, http://qgis.osgeo.org. b, Chronological representation of the investigated archaeological time periods of northwestern Africa, with each site’s radiocarbon-dated timeline indicated. c, Enlarged view of a PCA plot (Supplementary Fig. 3) with focus on the ancient individuals analysed. Each projected ancient individual is represented by a coloured symbol. W. Eur., West European; hist., historical. d, Estimated ancestry proportions for relevant African, Middle Eastern and European (Eur.) modern-day and ancient individuals (assuming five ancestry components; additional results are presented in Supplementary Fig. 4). Pre-Neolithic and Neolithic northwestern African populations/individuals are highlighted by the same symbols used in a and c.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Measures of genetic diversity in ancient (northwestern and sub-Saharan) Africans and Eurasians, computed using diploid calls from higher-coverage (over ninefold genome coverage) individuals.
ac, Ancient individuals (including oub002, ktg004 and skh001) are compared with modern-day individuals from geographically corresponding regions. a, Runs of homozygosity. ne1, Neolithic European 1; NSEG, number of homozygote segments. b, Heterozygosity, calculated from the number of variable positions per individual divided by the number of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sites per individual. c, Effective population size over time, as inferred by pairwise sequentially Markovian coalescent, for three ancient northwestern Africans with over ninefold genome coverage, as well as for a Mesolithic European individual (Loschbour) and a Neolithic European individual (Stuttgart), and modern-day individuals for comparison.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Genetic affinities of Stone Age northwestern Africans and schematic summary of the population history of the Maghreb.
a, Genetic affinity of analysed Stone Age northwestern African individuals, polarized between Neolithic Anatolia and Maghrebi ancestry, using the f4 test of the form f4(Anatolia Neolithic, TAF011; Stone Age northwestern African individuals, Mbuti). b, Genetic affinity of Stone Age northwestern African individuals, polarized between Early Neolithic Iberian and Levantine ancestry using f4 test of the form f4(Iberia Early Neolithic, Levant Chalcolithic; Neolithic northwestern African individuals, Mbuti). a,b, Each symbol represents a single individual f4 value. Error bars indicate ±2 s.e., computed with a block jack-knife approach (5 Mb blocks weighted by the number of SNPs). c, Summary of inferred population history of the Stone Age Maghreb.

References

    1. Linstädter J, Medved I, Solich M, Weniger G-C. Neolithisation process within the Alboran territory: models and possible African impact. Quat. Int. 2012;274:219–232. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.01.013. - DOI
    1. Martínez-Sánchez RM, Vera-Rodríguez JC, Pérez-Jordà G, Peña-Chocarro L, Bokbot Y. The beginning of the Neolithic in northwestern Morocco. Quat. Int. 2018;470:485–496. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.05.052. - DOI
    1. Zilhão J. Early prehistoric navigation in the Western Mediterranean: implications for the Neolithic transition in Iberia and the Maghreb. Isl. Archaeol. Orig. Seafaring East. Mediterr. 2014;11:185–200.
    1. Mulazzani S, et al. The emergence of the Neolithic in North Africa: a new model for the Eastern Maghreb. Quat. Int. 2016;410:123–143. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.11.089. - DOI
    1. Linstädter J. The Epipalaeolithic-Neolithic-Transition in the Mediterranean region of Northwest Africa. Quartär. International Yearbook for Ice Age and Stone Age Research. 2008;55:41–62.

Publication types