Skip to main content

Timeline for Standard Loopholes

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 7 at 3:06 answer added Lucenaposition timeline score: 1
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:50 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://puzzling.stackexchange.com/ with https://puzzling.stackexchange.com/
Mar 16, 2017 at 16:38 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/
Jan 21, 2016 at 2:37 answer added Y     e     z timeline score: 1
Jan 11, 2016 at 17:26 answer added Corey Ogburn timeline score: 7
Aug 20, 2015 at 18:08 answer added GentlePurpleRain timeline score: 2
Oct 24, 2014 at 14:43 comment added kaine Please see this previous discussion in which problems like the prophesized battle one were considered off topic and I provide a (downvoted) dissenting opinion: meta.puzzling.stackexchange.com/questions/227/…
Oct 24, 2014 at 14:40 answer added kaine timeline score: 8
Oct 24, 2014 at 14:23 comment added kaine You do have to be careful about this. Alot of riddle's answers are "find the loophole in this situation". This is why originally questions that invited speculative answers and riddles were always off topic. If you ask a riddle, answers that are valid but not what questioner intended still are valid answers.
Oct 21, 2014 at 14:55 comment added Zibbobz @Emrakul I'd consider all of those to be standard loopholes of a singluar type - assumptions and objects not included in the puzzle itself.
Oct 19, 2014 at 1:31 comment added user20 I don't think it's creative/tricky answers that are the problem; I think the problem has to do with answers that actively ignore the requirements of the question. (i.e. "The oracle is just lying!" or "Just stop imagining" or "Stab the robber with the knife you obviously took with you")
Oct 13, 2014 at 13:01 history asked Joe CC BY-SA 3.0