Timeline for Find the correct pattern in this series
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2023 at 13:11 | comment | added | Chris_abc | I think I follow. However, I don't think it is consistent to say that the first 6 numbers are not in modular arithmetic, and then the next numbers are in modular arithmetic. Yours is also not the answer given as the correct solution. I edited that into my original question if you want to see it. | |
| Nov 23, 2023 at 11:40 | comment | added | Evargalo | That's a smart idea, but it doesn't explain why a number would sometimes be represented by its positive equivalent and sometimes not. e.g., in the "final sequence" you propose, both -10 and 7 appear. | |
| Nov 22, 2023 at 19:35 | history | answered | 10010100102ohno | CC BY-SA 4.0 |