Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

7
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ 25 > 24, but the following 25-day schedule has no consecutive sum of 11: 2 1 1 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 15, 2024 at 22:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @RobPratt - Ah, I see where I went wrong; it's possible for two numbers in the set to correspond to the same number which is not in the set, so splitting it into 24 distinct pairs of numbers isn't correct. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 15, 2024 at 22:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @RobPratt - I've fixed the logic. With this correction, I believe the minimum is actually 27 days. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 15, 2024 at 23:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, with 48 pills, a 26-day 11-free schedule is possible, but a 27-day 11-free schedule is not. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 16, 2024 at 1:30
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I cleaned up my answer a bit to make it clear which part of it was originally incorrect (since it's now the accepted answer). I don't think my answer should have been accepted, as Ankoganit's answer was posted before mine and also supplies a sufficient proof. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 17, 2024 at 5:39