Different people may have different cut off period for retro; this PlayStation game is from 1997.

However, I suspect that several people are voting to close because the question is not very high quality, rather than down voting instead. Questions can be off topic and good quality or on topic and poor quality.

I suggest the question is poor quality because it is very specific, and also difficult to answer without a lot of inside knowledge. I suspect that any answer would not be very interesting, but I am not trying to criticise the questioner.

I think the question should be permitted, but left to die of natural causes. I have voted to reopen accordingly.

Different people may have different cut off period for retro; this PlayStation game is from 1997.

However, I suspect that several people are voting to close because the question is not very high quality, rather than down voting instead. Questions can be off topic and good quality or on topic and poor quality.

I suggest the question is poor quality because it is very specific, and also difficult to answer without a lot of inside knowledge. I suspect that any answer would not be very interesting, but I am not trying to criticise the questioner, a new user to the site.

I think the question should be permitted, but left to die of natural causes. I have voted to reopen accordingly.