Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

6
  • 24
    "anything less powerful would be too weak to run a keyboard" -- I don't think one can make that claim without evidence. Commented Jun 17 at 12:02
  • 7
    Why is a keyboard such a demanding computing workload? Typical PC keyboards would scan the whole keyboard once every 3ms, then process debouncing and rollover...it's not very much work for it. Commented Jun 17 at 22:41
  • 2
    How much did keyboards cost in those days? They may have been a non-negligible fraction of the cost of a computer. Commented Jun 17 at 23:48
  • 6
    The question is missing an important bit. Microcontrollers or processors are normally used in keyboards that are separated from the main PCB and communicating with a serial protocol.Many home computers had the keyboard integrated in the casing, often connected and decoded on the main PCB. Commented Jun 18 at 5:39
  • 6
    In some active retro-computing communities there are cases of an "inversion", because modern keyboards or DIY adapters based on Arduinos are connected to old 8-bit machines. :^D These keyboards have a lot more CPU power than the computer. Commented Jun 18 at 5:53